You have likely worked with the data for a long time and so it might make sense to you. Interpretation is a subjective exercise. Regardless of where it's mentioned a good discussion section includes analysis of any unexpected findings. But remember you can always edit your subheadings retrospectively.
In this case, highlighting these themes in your findings chapter may be the most appropriate way to proceed. You may consider your university writing guidelines to choose the method to name your specific chapter.
For the first time in the dissertation, the researcher can state a personal opinion when the collected data support it.
Students often make the mistake of including quotations without any other information. Just like with the qualitative data, you must ensure that your data is appropriately organised. But you must be diligent in the work that you cut out.
We also assume that you have used some sort of software program to help you with the organisation of your findings. It will be awesome if you can write this statement in 3 sentences.
Use of the first person is generally acceptable. Writing in Psychology course syllabus. Linking to previous chapters Presentation of your analysis is going to be one of the more challenging things that you have to undertake.
Usually anything after 3 numerical points does not get a number and would not appear in your table of contents. What might make the machine break? While a spider diagram encourages you to see connections, a matrix forces you to think about hierarchy. If you have not completed this process, you must do so before beginning to write.
Let's outline the main takeaway points: To further develop the snowflake, Wendy will write at least four points under each subhead, to make paragraph headings.
You should explain it to me clearly, in a narrative, without restating your results. The whiteboard was an ideal medium for this task. Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretation of those results and their significance in relation to the research problem, not the data itself.
The snowflake method is a technique used by novel writers. I think we made good progress with a whiteboard in the last meeting and I asked her if I could share what we did with the world, she generously agreed thanks Wendy!
Many students try to make their research fit into the IMRAD format, when it is not appropriate to do so. This process can generally be done at the end. The Ph factor is somewhat elusive and hard to describe, but basically it means you have to make some knowledge claims. If you have any doubts regarding your work, why not to seek the help from professionals?
This is a creative process which involves reading over the mud map again and again, writing ideas for over arching themes under which the findings might fit. Begin by briefly re-stating the research problem you were investigating and answer all of the research questions underpinning the problem that you posed in the introduction.
But then, a word of caution: Secondly, you must include any particularly interesting findings that have cropped up as you completed your research. As we wrote the findings into the bubbles we shifted the wording to find shorter ways of saying the same thing and started to blend some of the findings together.
You need to ensure that you have clearly identified data that relates to your research questions, hypotheses, or themes of your study. Using first person can help emphasize a point or illustrate a contrasting finding.
Another useful suggestion from Howard Becker is the null hypothesis technique; write down why the results mean nothing. Tell the reader what they need to know and try to organise the information in a way that makes the most sense to you and your project.“Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (January ): ; Kretchmer, Paul.
Fourteen Steps to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. San Francisco Edit, Structure and Writing Style Don't Write Two Results Sections! The discussion chapter is the problem child of the thesis. The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt.
Not everyone writes a chapter called “discussion”, but everyone has to do discussiony bits because, well – that’s where the creative magic of the PhD happens. Indeed, every discussion should include a "humility" section that addresses the study's limitations, write Cone and Foster.
But avoid beginning the discussion with a. WRITING CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS December 5, May 30, Summarize the Chapter 4: Results. Discussion. This is the hardest part to write because committees may challenge the interpretation of the data in the Defense.
How to write a Discussion chapter for your thesis or dissertation I noticed that the Discussion chapter is one of the hardest to write, especially when you are so close to the results and your head is wrapped up in all the data.
When writing a dissertation or thesis, the results and discussion sections can be both the most interesting as well as the most challenging sections to write. You may choose to write these sections separately, or combine them into a single chapter, depending on your university’s guidelines and.Download